Family Values in Ancient Times:
Many people of the inform make some very grave and disturbing assumptions most prior unethical activity by humans. My theories haw be biased and overly appreciative of a time before Empire and there is inferior data due to the destructive power of Empire and the hegemony to go on. However, that data is more pure and inferior probable to have been promoted or propagandized for the interests of power-mongers. Top scholars and those who are regarded as great academics still speaking whether women ever had equal rights and some land there never were matriarchal societies of great note. It would be a surprise for me if there were not some different approaches used in various cultures and millennia before the Ice Age we just experienced and thereafter, leading up to what we call history. Much of history today has every the markings of hegemony akin to the Middle Ages according to John Ralston king who says it “has become to resemble the obscure and controlling traditionalism of the Middle Ages.” (1)
Could it be that ethics and moral activity had higher importance in the communal houses of the Kelts and North American Indians, as well as another societies throughout this awesome world? We now know it has been traversed by ancient humans who loved and played every over the place for a far individual period than we have been lead to believe even though some haw not be aware of these facts. Is it possible that basic principles were easily communicated and attitude was the goal of people long ago? Why even speaking the saucer most power and money – they had little requirement of it. Western society still has much of the ingrained hatred of millennia of macho sea mores and the rest of the world is far worse. What greater issue is there than incest and kinsfolk violence? It rots the fabric of families and society as a whole. This quote from reputable anthropologist Carlton Coon most the ‘hunting societies’ of prehistory sets a stage we requirement to appreciate and evaluate.
“While under certain circumstances, in some societies, a young man haw marry a woman past menopause, he haw control to have sexed relations with another women, and haw yet get a nubile ordinal wife.” (2)
This seems a workable arrangement that includes education and the planning of families to avoid unnecessary abortion or mouths who aren’t truly cared for, doesn’t it? The senior woman presumably would be able to satisfy the early sexed energy of the young man, without leading their social or tribal culture into every the problems associated with children having children such as often happens today. The young man might even develop some sexed techniques and wager his urges better than pure lustful infatuation or the requirement to run off to fight in order to get ravishment and pillage payment for some Lord or Caesar. Then when financially and emotionally prepared for parenting he might actually do a decent job. Coon was able to notice this still exists in some Neolithic societies of the inform day. When the ordinal wife arrived it might inform some problems but in most cases the first wife would belike enjoy helping the new wife to wager her opportunities better. Yes, I do overstate the case, I suppose, but in the Keltic clandoms it was even better than I am suggesting.
Kids were a resource and source of pride for the full clan. In the dynamic of raising a child this allowed for some things to occur in a more mature surround with inferior emotive blackmail. That does not lessen the aspirations parents have for their children but it makes for a aggregation inferior vicarious pressure, as parents have to spend every their waking hours attending to the needs of kids; who wager a way to get what they want by playing to the unrealistic parents who have yet to learn what they requirement to know. There are aspects of North American Indians tribes that show a kindred approach to child-raising. The Stadacona Indians sent some of their children with Cartier, much as the Kelts shared educational opportunities with trading partners. Aunts and uncles do the disciplining of children among the Cree. The extended kinsfolk and communal living is very clannish and even Gibbon noted there were emblem Indian regalia that mirrored those of British heraldry.
The Hurons and Indian are most like the Irish or Norse Kelts in their social structure. Crimes sworn by a member of a kinsfolk or clan (tribe) are paid for by the full family. With this kind of policing or morals bureaucracy would starve for want of something to do. The compassion and activity modification of a kinsfolk is better than that of the personnel or prisons, I think. The women of the Indian were the decision makers in most cases except the daily running of a war once it was approved. These women owned the assets or leaseholds. No one owned land just as was true in the land use laws of the Kelts which the English had to expunge along with every another just and fair culture when they eventually forced Ireland under their rule. The Indians still practice Potlatch or the giving of attitude and assets despite the 1920s law against it in Canada. We can every imagine the Tax collectors don’t like this kind of custom. It was much more than mere taxes the government wanted and the Supreme Court has ruled the government and Christian Church were intent on the total destruction of Indian beliefs, in recent rulings.
“In any event, the incest tabus recognized in any given hunting society bear some relationship to his choice (or to his and/or her parents’ choice) of a marital partner. Of these prohibitions there are three basic and quite different incest tabus, prohibiting intercourse between father and daughter, care and son, and brother and sister. These prohibitions are not based on instinct or the inductive experience of the genetic consequences that sometimes result {Like the idiots and haemophiliacs or sexed deviates who lead us as a result of ‘noble’ heritage – to war and another great heroic endeavours.}. Some individuals violate them, but if so the violations do not result in marriage.
To a goodish extent these primary incest tabus are based on two kinds of antisocial results. Parent-child intercourse would disrupt the lines of authority between generations, lines that hold the kinsfolk together. Brother-sister intercourse during adolescence would inhibit intermarriage between families, reducing their interdependence. Were a married woman to have intercourse with her brother, it would create a land of serious offend between her husband and his brother-in-law, two kinsmen by wedlock who, in certain cultures, might requirement each other’s confidence and help.” (3)
The ‘controlling traditionalism of the Middle Ages’ referred to by Ralston king was conception of the continuing effort to destroy these real kinsfolk values. The wedlock laws of the Kelts had to be eliminated because these laws were equitable and fair to women and children. Bastards were not ever possible in Keltic society and the idea of a single care was totally different than it is today. Of course, the payment of mercenaries including the ravishment and pillage which enabled men to gradually lose every decent tabus or constructs based on the ancient effectuation of care for each another that were conception of every the systems Brotherhood developed, finished ordinary sense. The elevation of Gods from the land of hero (mere human) to Divine Rights and separate from Nature, is at the root of a aggregation of it. anthropologist thinks Odin was a Keltic king in southern Russia around the time of Christ and I find that entirely likely. When man began to say another men were unable to comprehend nature and needed an interpreter for the collective feeling of humanity and every life, things began the downward drift to the hegemony that often even denies man has a soul.
The extent of character assassination by academics that do not delve into the reasons for Caesar’s propaganda or quote others who did not employ due diligence is as evident today as it ever was. The people who focus on Keltic sacrifices and trophy nous customs are informing a fact but not the full truth. What is abortion and top punishment if not sacrificing the life of people, perhaps for a ordinary good? Victorian prudishness developed the ‘sins and demons’ fear-mongering of Jehovian greed even further. In fact the Western Tradition has succeeded in the destruction of every Ancient Knowledge if you were to believe what is allowed to be disseminated finished ‘official’ or educational channels. The Temples of Saphos and Mesopotamia connected every sea cultures in some form of forced prostitution for women, while the Biblical ‘Devoted Ones’ were sacrificed when the vodoun or his cronies were finished with another obvious and disgusting uses of them. Often the orphans and waifs caused by the changing laws and racial unrest and prejudice fomented in these times, led souls to a place worse than the Hell ruled by the Christian created Satan. The excellent aggregation called The Golden Bough by Sir saint Frazer gives plenteous evidence from credible sources most burning Red Heads and women of every classes being forced to sell their bodies and give the money to the Temple. It haw have started with patriarch (and another Ur-Story proponents with their harems) and his baby-factories but it was certainly not the way of ancient Kelts even after his time. The Indians of North America and the natives of Hawaii are plenteous testimony of the diversity of Keltic egalitarian approaches.
Many people of the inform make some very grave and disturbing assumptions most prior unethical activity by humans. My theories haw be biased and overly appreciative of a time before Empire and there is inferior data due to the destructive power of Empire and the hegemony to go on. However, that data is more pure and inferior probable to have been promoted or propagandized for the interests of power-mongers. Top scholars and those who are regarded as great academics still speaking whether women ever had equal rights and some land there never were matriarchal societies of great note. It would be a surprise for me if there were not some different approaches used in various cultures and millennia before the Ice Age we just experienced and thereafter, leading up to what we call history. Much of history today has every the markings of hegemony akin to the Middle Ages according to John Ralston king who says it “has become to resemble the obscure and controlling traditionalism of the Middle Ages.” (1)
Could it be that ethics and moral activity had higher importance in the communal houses of the Kelts and North American Indians, as well as another societies throughout this awesome world? We now know it has been traversed by ancient humans who loved and played every over the place for a far individual period than we have been lead to believe even though some haw not be aware of these facts. Is it possible that basic principles were easily communicated and attitude was the goal of people long ago? Why even speaking the saucer most power and money – they had little requirement of it. Western society still has much of the ingrained hatred of millennia of macho sea mores and the rest of the world is far worse. What greater issue is there than incest and kinsfolk violence? It rots the fabric of families and society as a whole. This quote from reputable anthropologist Carlton Coon most the ‘hunting societies’ of prehistory sets a stage we requirement to appreciate and evaluate.
“While under certain circumstances, in some societies, a young man haw marry a woman past menopause, he haw control to have sexed relations with another women, and haw yet get a nubile ordinal wife.” (2)
This seems a workable arrangement that includes education and the planning of families to avoid unnecessary abortion or mouths who aren’t truly cared for, doesn’t it? The senior woman presumably would be able to satisfy the early sexed energy of the young man, without leading their social or tribal culture into every the problems associated with children having children such as often happens today. The young man might even develop some sexed techniques and wager his urges better than pure lustful infatuation or the requirement to run off to fight in order to get ravishment and pillage payment for some Lord or Caesar. Then when financially and emotionally prepared for parenting he might actually do a decent job. Coon was able to notice this still exists in some Neolithic societies of the inform day. When the ordinal wife arrived it might inform some problems but in most cases the first wife would belike enjoy helping the new wife to wager her opportunities better. Yes, I do overstate the case, I suppose, but in the Keltic clandoms it was even better than I am suggesting.
Kids were a resource and source of pride for the full clan. In the dynamic of raising a child this allowed for some things to occur in a more mature surround with inferior emotive blackmail. That does not lessen the aspirations parents have for their children but it makes for a aggregation inferior vicarious pressure, as parents have to spend every their waking hours attending to the needs of kids; who wager a way to get what they want by playing to the unrealistic parents who have yet to learn what they requirement to know. There are aspects of North American Indians tribes that show a kindred approach to child-raising. The Stadacona Indians sent some of their children with Cartier, much as the Kelts shared educational opportunities with trading partners. Aunts and uncles do the disciplining of children among the Cree. The extended kinsfolk and communal living is very clannish and even Gibbon noted there were emblem Indian regalia that mirrored those of British heraldry.
The Hurons and Indian are most like the Irish or Norse Kelts in their social structure. Crimes sworn by a member of a kinsfolk or clan (tribe) are paid for by the full family. With this kind of policing or morals bureaucracy would starve for want of something to do. The compassion and activity modification of a kinsfolk is better than that of the personnel or prisons, I think. The women of the Indian were the decision makers in most cases except the daily running of a war once it was approved. These women owned the assets or leaseholds. No one owned land just as was true in the land use laws of the Kelts which the English had to expunge along with every another just and fair culture when they eventually forced Ireland under their rule. The Indians still practice Potlatch or the giving of attitude and assets despite the 1920s law against it in Canada. We can every imagine the Tax collectors don’t like this kind of custom. It was much more than mere taxes the government wanted and the Supreme Court has ruled the government and Christian Church were intent on the total destruction of Indian beliefs, in recent rulings.
“In any event, the incest tabus recognized in any given hunting society bear some relationship to his choice (or to his and/or her parents’ choice) of a marital partner. Of these prohibitions there are three basic and quite different incest tabus, prohibiting intercourse between father and daughter, care and son, and brother and sister. These prohibitions are not based on instinct or the inductive experience of the genetic consequences that sometimes result {Like the idiots and haemophiliacs or sexed deviates who lead us as a result of ‘noble’ heritage – to war and another great heroic endeavours.}. Some individuals violate them, but if so the violations do not result in marriage.
To a goodish extent these primary incest tabus are based on two kinds of antisocial results. Parent-child intercourse would disrupt the lines of authority between generations, lines that hold the kinsfolk together. Brother-sister intercourse during adolescence would inhibit intermarriage between families, reducing their interdependence. Were a married woman to have intercourse with her brother, it would create a land of serious offend between her husband and his brother-in-law, two kinsmen by wedlock who, in certain cultures, might requirement each other’s confidence and help.” (3)
The ‘controlling traditionalism of the Middle Ages’ referred to by Ralston king was conception of the continuing effort to destroy these real kinsfolk values. The wedlock laws of the Kelts had to be eliminated because these laws were equitable and fair to women and children. Bastards were not ever possible in Keltic society and the idea of a single care was totally different than it is today. Of course, the payment of mercenaries including the ravishment and pillage which enabled men to gradually lose every decent tabus or constructs based on the ancient effectuation of care for each another that were conception of every the systems Brotherhood developed, finished ordinary sense. The elevation of Gods from the land of hero (mere human) to Divine Rights and separate from Nature, is at the root of a aggregation of it. anthropologist thinks Odin was a Keltic king in southern Russia around the time of Christ and I find that entirely likely. When man began to say another men were unable to comprehend nature and needed an interpreter for the collective feeling of humanity and every life, things began the downward drift to the hegemony that often even denies man has a soul.
The extent of character assassination by academics that do not delve into the reasons for Caesar’s propaganda or quote others who did not employ due diligence is as evident today as it ever was. The people who focus on Keltic sacrifices and trophy nous customs are informing a fact but not the full truth. What is abortion and top punishment if not sacrificing the life of people, perhaps for a ordinary good? Victorian prudishness developed the ‘sins and demons’ fear-mongering of Jehovian greed even further. In fact the Western Tradition has succeeded in the destruction of every Ancient Knowledge if you were to believe what is allowed to be disseminated finished ‘official’ or educational channels. The Temples of Saphos and Mesopotamia connected every sea cultures in some form of forced prostitution for women, while the Biblical ‘Devoted Ones’ were sacrificed when the vodoun or his cronies were finished with another obvious and disgusting uses of them. Often the orphans and waifs caused by the changing laws and racial unrest and prejudice fomented in these times, led souls to a place worse than the Hell ruled by the Christian created Satan. The excellent aggregation called The Golden Bough by Sir saint Frazer gives plenteous evidence from credible sources most burning Red Heads and women of every classes being forced to sell their bodies and give the money to the Temple. It haw have started with patriarch (and another Ur-Story proponents with their harems) and his baby-factories but it was certainly not the way of ancient Kelts even after his time. The Indians of North America and the natives of Hawaii are plenteous testimony of the diversity of Keltic egalitarian approaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment